Archive
main page
|
"To follow knowledge like a sinking star,
Beyond the utmost bound of human thought..."
- Tennyson
|
click here for a bigger sunset
One small voice in the proud tradition of FreeBlogging*
Thursday, February 27, 2003
posted by gbarto
at 1:09 AM:
An excellent Washington Post editorial on why Iraq must be dealt with. Excerpt:The right question, though, is not "Is war risky?" but "Is inaction less so?" No one can provide more than a judgment in reply. But the world is already a dangerous place. Anthrax has been wielded in Florida, New York and Washington. Terrorists have struck repeatedly and with increasing strength over the past decade. Are the United States and its allies ultimately safer if they back down again and leave Saddam Hussein secure? Or does safety lie in making clear that his kind of outlaw behavior will not be tolerated and in helping Iraq become a peaceable nation that offers no haven to terrorists? We would say the latter, while acknowledging the magnitude of the challenge, both during and especially after any war that may have to be fought.
* * *
The TurkeyBlog main page contains only the 20 most recent entries.
To go further back, check the archive in the right hand bar.
|
|